UTA - NM: Explaining Stated Preferences with Additive Non-Monotonic Utility Functions
نویسنده
چکیده
UTA methods use linear programming techniques for finding additive utility functions that best explain stated preferences. However, most UTA methods including the popular UTA-Star are limited to monotonic preferences. UTA-NM (Non Monotonic) is inspired by UTA Star but allows non-monotonic partial utility functions if they decrease total model error. The shape of the utility functions is determined automatically while overfitting is prevented by balancing the model error with model simplicity. The resulting program is linear and convex, but it requires significantly more CPU time than other UTA methods. The evaluation of the method on a synthetic task achieves the same Pearson Coefficient between the model and stated preferences as Despotis Non-Monotonic UTA. Unlike this method, UTA-NM does not require the provision of information on the shape of the utility function neither is it restricted to one change of shape per criterion.
منابع مشابه
Goals, Desires, Utilities and Preferences
In this paper we study the logic of goals, which are formalized as desires with an utilitarian semantics. In our framework goals have a dual character, because they are constraints on utility functions as well as constructors of these utility functions. The non-monotonic reasoning related to the constructors reeects that goals are used as heuristic approximations of preferences in decision maki...
متن کاملExplaining Heterogeneity in Risk Preferences Using a Finite Mixture Model
This paper studies the effect of the space (distance) between lotteries' outcomes on risk-taking behavior and the shape of estimated utility and probability weighting functions. Previously investigated experimental data shows a significant space effect in the gain domain. As compared to low spaced lotteries, high spaced lotteries are associated with higher risk aversion for high probabilities o...
متن کاملExpressive Power of Weighted Propositional Formulas for Cardinal Preference Modeling
As proposed in various places, a set of propositional formulas, each associated with a numerical weight, can be used to model the preferences of an agent in combinatorial domains. If the range of possible choices can be represented by the set of possible assignments of propositional symbols to truth values, then the utility of an assignment is given by the sum of the weights of the formulas it ...
متن کاملConsumption-Based Asset Pricing with Recursive Utility
In this paper it has been attempted to investigate the capability of the consumption-based capital asset pricing model (CCAPM), using the general method of moment (GMM), with regard to the Epstien-zin recursive preferences model for Iran's capital market. Generally speaking, recursive utility permits disentangling of the two psychologically separate concepts of risk aversion and elasticity of i...
متن کاملInvestigating the Role of real Money Balances in Households' Preferences function in the Framework of the Assets Pricing Models (M-CCAPM): Case study of Iran
In this paper, we try to develop and modify the basic model of the consumption-based capital asset pricing model by adding the growth in real money balances rate as a risk factor in the household's utility function as (M-CCAPM). For this purpose, two forms of utility function with constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) preferences and recursive preferences have been used such that M1 and M2 are...
متن کامل